From Hearing to Understanding: A New Perspective on Academic Listening Challenges

Authors

  • Deasy Yunita Siregar Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Ukhty Amaliah Rambe Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Anggun Mayang Sari Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Rihadatul Aisy Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Safaril Khoir Nasution Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Bela Sakila Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jipm.v4i1.2043

Keywords:

academic listening, listening comprehension, metacognitive strategies, higher education, EFL learners

Abstract

Academic listening is a core academic skill that plays a vital role in students’ success in higher education, particularly for learners studying in a second or foreign language context. Despite its importance, listening is often misunderstood as a passive activity limited to hearing spoken input, rather than an active process of meaning construction. In practice, many university students experience difficulty transforming auditory input from lectures, seminars, and academic discussions into coherent understanding. This article aims to reconceptualize academic listening by shifting the focus from hearing to understanding. Using a qualitative descriptive library-based research approach, this study synthesizes theoretical and empirical literature on academic listening, listening comprehension, and metacognitive listening strategies. The analysis reveals that academic listening challenges are multidimensional, encompassing linguistic complexity, cognitive load, limited background knowledge, cultural and discourse differences, as well as affective factors such as listening anxiety. Furthermore, the findings emphasize the crucial role of metacognitive awareness in enabling learners to regulate their listening processes effectively. This article argues that academic listening should be viewed as an active, strategic, and teachable skill, and it offers pedagogical implications for improving listening instruction in higher education contexts.

References

Anderson, J. R. (2015). Cognitive psychology and its implications (8th ed.). Worth Publishers.

Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press.

Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Field, J. (2013). Cognitive validity. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. xx–xx). Wiley-Blackwell.

Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Goh, C. C. M., & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.769558

Graham, S. (2017). Research into practice: Listening strategies in second language learning. Language Teaching, 50(1), 107–119.

Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2011). Exploring listening comprehension. ELT Journal, 65(2), 113–126.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. Cambridge University Press.

Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and researching listening (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

Siegel, J. (2014). Exploring listening strategy instruction. ELT Journal, 68(1), 22–33.

Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25.

Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Deasy Yunita Siregar, Ukhty Amaliah Rambe, Anggun Mayang Sari, Rihadatul Aisy, Safaril Khoir Nasution, & Bela Sakila. (2026). From Hearing to Understanding: A New Perspective on Academic Listening Challenges. JURNAL ILMIAH PENELITIAN MAHASISWA, 4(1), 1151–1160. https://doi.org/10.61722/jipm.v4i1.2043

Issue

Section

##section.default.title##