ANALISIS HUBUNGAN SOCIAL PRESENCE, PLEASURE, DAN IMPULSIVE BUYING DALAM KONTEKS LIVE STREAMING TIKTOK PADA GENERASI Z

Authors

  • Amelia Putri Ananda Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Terrylina Arfinta Monoarfa Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Annisa Lutfia Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61722/jemba.v2i5.1296

Keywords:

Social Presence, Streamer, Viewers, Pleasure, Impulsive Buying, TikTok Shop, PLS-SEM.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaruh kehadiran sosial streamer
dan kehadiran sosial pemirsa terhadap pembelian impulsif melalui kesenangan sebagai
variabel mediasi pada konteks live streaming TikTok Shop di kalangan Generasi Z.
Metode penelitian ini menggunakan Analisa Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
dengan menggunakan Partial Least Square (PLS), software yang digunakan adalah
SmartPLS versi 4. Data dikumpulkan dari 270 responden pengguna aktif TikTok yang
pernah melakukan pembelian siaran melalui langsung (live streaming). Dapat
disimpulkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan dari kehadiran sosial
streamer terhadap kesenangan pada live streaming TikTok shop di kalangan gen Z, terdapat
pengaruh positif dan signifikan dari kehadiran sosial pemirsa terhadap kesenangan pada
streaming langsung TikTok toko di kalangan gen Z, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan dari
kesenangan terhadap pembelian impulsif pada streaming langsung toko TikTok di kalangan gen Z,
terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan dari kehadiran sosial streamer terhadap
pembelian impulsif pada streaming langsung TikTok toko di kalangan gen Z, terdapat pengaruh
positif dan signifikan dari kehadiran sosial pemirsa pembelian impulsif pada
streaming langsung toko TikTok di kalangan gen Z, terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan dari
kehadiran sosial streamer dan kehadiran sosial pemirsa terhadap pembelian impulsif
melalui mediasi kesenangan pada live streaming TikTok shop di kalangan gen Z.

References

APJII. (2024). Pengguna Internet Indonesia Tembus 221 Juta, Didominasi Gen Z. KOMPAS.Com.

https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2024/02/01/09300027/pengguna-internet- indonesia-tembus-221-juta-didominasi-gen-z.

Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Gregg, J. L. (2023). The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Networked-Minds- M e a s u r e - o f - S o c i a l - P r e s e n c e - % 3 A - o f - B i o c c a - Harms/784977a00148ea24e1a65e6160823305a2ceb95c

Gao, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, M. (2022). The influence of emotions on impulse buying in live streaming commerce: A stimulus–organism–response framework. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 103097.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103097

Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hassouneh, D., & Brengman, M. (2015). A motivation-based typology of social virtual world users. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 718–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.018

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600314

Lee, S. H., Kim, S., & Park, J. (2020). Influence of social presence on consumers’ impulse buying in live commerce. Journal of Business Research, 120, 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.034

Liu, B. (2023, August). How social presence affects viewers’ impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 11(3), 145–152. https://www.joebm.com/vol11/JOEBM-V11N3-745.pdf

Mehrabian, A. (1977). Individual differences in stimulus screening and arousability. Journal of Personality, 45(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 6494.1977.tb00149.x

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). The basic emotional impact of environments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38(1), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1974.38.1.283

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. the MIT Press. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA0718977X?l=en

Pentina, I., Zhang, L., & Basmanova, O. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of trust in a social media brand: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(6), 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-05-2013-0606

Shen, K. N., & Khalifa, M. (2012). System design effects on social presence and telepresence in virtual communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(10), 703–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.05.009

Walther, J. B. (2006). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002

Widyanto, A., Nugraha, A., & Prasetyo, A. (2022). Understanding impulsive buying in e-commerce through hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Consumer Studies, 5(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.2224/jcs.2022.05207

Youn, S., & Faber, R. J. (2000). Impulse buying: Its relation to personality traits and cues. Advances in Consumer Research, 27, 179–185. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/8413

Zhang, M., Qin, F., Wang, G. A., & Luo, C. (2017). The impact of live video streaming on online purchase intention. Service Industries Journal, 37(15–16), 1033–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2017.1365146

Zhao, L., Fu, B., & Bai, S. A. (2022). Understanding the bandwagon effect in live streaming commerce: The role of peer influence. Electronic Commerce Research, 22(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09512-1

Downloads

Published

2025-08-04

How to Cite

Amelia Putri Ananda, Terrylina Arfinta Monoarfa, & Annisa Lutfia. (2025). ANALISIS HUBUNGAN SOCIAL PRESENCE, PLEASURE, DAN IMPULSIVE BUYING DALAM KONTEKS LIVE STREAMING TIKTOK PADA GENERASI Z. JURNAL ILMIAH EKONOMI, MANAJEMEN, BISNIS DAN AKUNTANSI, 2(5), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.61722/jemba.v2i5.1296

Issue

Section

Articles