Pengaruh Rotasi Audit, Audit Report Lag Dan Fee Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kap (Kantor Akuntan Publik) Di Wilayah Kota Palembang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jemba.v3i5.3023Keywords:
Audit Rotation, Audit Report Lag, Audit Fees, Audit QualityAbstract
This study aims to examine the effect of audit rotation, audit report lag, and audit fees on audit quality at Public Accounting Firms (Kantor Akuntan Publik/KAP) in the Palembang City area. This research employed a quantitative approach with a causal associative research design. Primary data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 45 auditors selected using purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), including data quality tests, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis, the coefficient of determination (R²), the t-test, and the F-test. The results indicate that audit rotation and audit report lag have no significant effect on audit quality, while audit fees have a positive and significant effect on audit quality. Simultaneously, audit rotation, audit report lag, and audit fees have a significant effect on audit quality. The Adjusted R Square value of 0.878 indicates that 87.8% of the variation in audit quality is explained by the three independent variables, while the remaining 12.2% is influenced by other factors outside the research model. This study is expected to serve as a reference for Public Accounting Firms in improving audit quality and for future researchers in developing studies on factors affecting audit quality.
References
Alvin A. Arens, Randal J. Elder, & Mark S. Beasley. (2017). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (16th ed.). Pearson.
Ashton, R. H., Willingham, J. J., & Elliott, R. K. (1987). An empirical analysis of audit delay. Journal of Accounting Research, 25(2), 275–292.
Carslaw, C. A. P. N., & Kaplan, S. E. (1991). An examination of audit delay: Further evidence from New Zealand. Accounting and Business Research, 22(85), 21–32.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.
Dyer, J. C., & McHugh, A. J. (1975). The timeliness of the Australian annual report. Journal of Accounting Research, 13(2), 204–219.
Faradilla, R., & Setiawan, A. (2025). Pengaruh faktor audit terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 29(1), 45–58.
Fellicia, N., & Astuti, D. (2025). Independensi auditor dan kualitas audit pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 17(1), 23–37.
Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345–368.
Ghosh, A., & Moon, D. (2005). Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 585–612.
Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS (Edisi 10). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Habib, A., Bhuiyan, M. B. U., Huang, H. J., & Miah, M. S. (2019). Determinants of Audit Report Lag: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 23(1), 20–44.
Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141–191.
Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2022). Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: IAPI.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 17/PMK.01/2008 tentang Jasa Akuntan Publik.
Madjir, H. S., dkk. (2025). Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi dan Laporan Akhir. Palembang: FEB Universitas Tridinanti.
Mautz, R. K., & Sharaf, H. A. (1961). The Philosophy of Auditing. American Accounting Association.
Owusu-Ansah, S. (2000). Timeliness of Corporate Financial Reporting in Emerging Capital Markets. Accounting and Business Research, 30(3), 241–254.
Simunic, D. A. (1980). The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-3). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Yusuf, M., Hidayat, T., & Rahman, F. (2025). Audit Quality and Investor Confidence in Emerging Markets. International Journal of Auditing and Accounting Studies, 7(1), 25–39.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL ILMIAH EKONOMI, MANAJEMEN, BISNIS DAN AKUNTANSI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
