Kajian Pustaka Komparatif Protokol Komunikasi Internet of Things Berdasarkan Latensi, Efesiensi Energi, dan Skalabilitas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61722/jipm.v4i2.2269Keywords:
internet of things, mqtt, coap, http, latency, energy efficiency, scalabilityAbstract
This study presents a comparative literature review of Internet of Things (IoT) communication protocols, focusing on latency, energy efficiency, and scalability. The rapid development of IoT applications requires efficient communication mechanisms capable of handling constrained devices and large-scale networks. This research adopts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach by analyzing relevant studies published between 2021 and 2026 from reputable databases such as Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and MDPI. The results indicate that no single protocol outperforms others across all performance parameters. CoAP demonstrates superior performance in latency and energy efficiency due to its lightweight UDP-based communication. MQTT provides stable latency and high scalability through its publish–subscribe architecture, making it suitable for large-scale IoT systems. Meanwhile, HTTP/HTTPS offers high interoperability but suffers from higher latency and energy consumption. The findings highlight the importance of selecting communication protocols based on specific application requirements. This study contributes by providing an integrated comparative analysis that considers multiple performance aspects simultaneously, offering a more comprehensive perspective for IoT system design
References
Aleesha, M., & Laseena. (2022). MQTT Protocol for Resource Constrained IoT Applications : A Review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Energy and Environment 2022 (ICSEE 2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4299372
Azeez, H. H., & Abdullah, M., Z. (2023). Performance analysis of constrained application protocol (CoAP). AIP Conference Proceedings, 2591(1), 030074. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0119584
Enany, M. O. A., Harb, H. M., & Attiya, G. (2021). A Comparative analysis of MQTT and IoT application protocols. ICEEM. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEM52022.2021.9480384
Jamal, E., & Zyane, A. (2025). Comprehensive Analysis, Modeling, and Optimization of QoS in OneM2M for IoT Applications: Integrating HTTP, MQTT, and CoAP Protocols With Automatic Traffic SLA Management. International Journal of Communication Systems, 38(14), e70277. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.70227
Khaleefah, R. M., Abed, A. A., & Al-Shareeda, M. A. (2025). Empirical evaluation of MQTT, CoAP and HTTP for smart city Internet of Things applications. International Journal of Mechatronics, Robotics, and, Artificial Intelligence, 1(2), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.33971/ijmrai.1.2.10
Krawiec, J., Wybraniak-Kujawa, M., Jacyna-Golda, I., Kotylak, P., Panek, A., Wojtachnik, R., & Siedlecka-Wójcikowska, T. (2025). Energy footprint and reliability of IoT communication protocols for remote sensor networks. Sensors, 25(19), 6042. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25196042
Mustafa, R. Sarkar, N. I., Mohaghegh, M., Pervez, S., & Morados, R (2025). A secure and energy-efficient cross-layer network architecture for IoT. Sensors, 25(11), 3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113457
Nugraha, I. R., Putra, W. H. N, & Setiawan, E. (2024). A Comparative Study of HTTP and MQTT for IoT Applications in Hydroponics. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi, 8(1), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v8i1.5561
Panagou, I. C., Katsoulis, S., Nannos, E., Zantalis, F., & Koulouras, G. (2025). A comprehensive evaluation of IoT cloud platforms: A feature-driven review with a decision-making tool. Sensors, 25(16), 5124. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165124
Petrescu, I., Niculae, E., Vulturescu, V., Dimitrescu, A., & Ungureanu, L. M. (2025). Transport and application layer protocols for IoT: Comprehensive review. Technologies, 13(12), 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13120583
Silva, D., Carvalho, L. I., Soares, J., & Sofia, R. C. (2021). A performance analysis of Internet of Things networking protocols: Evaluating MQTT, CoAP, OPC UA. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 4879. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114879
Sonklin, K., & Sonklin, C. (2024). A performance evaluation of the Internet of Things–Message Queue Telemetry Transport protocol based water level warning system. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 14(6), 7178–7185. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i6.pp7178-7185
Sponh, M. A. (2022). On MQTT Scalability in the Internet of Things: Issues, Solutions, and Future Directions. JEEE, 1(1), 23-24. https://doi.org/10.37256/jeee.1120221687
Tripathi, S., & Chaurasia, B. K. (2023). Broker Clustering Enabled Lightweight Communication in IoT using MQTT. ISCON. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCON57294.2023.10112105
Zhang, S., You, X., Zhang, P., Huang, M., & Li, S. (2022). A UCB-based dynamic CoAP mode selection algorithm in distribution IoT. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(1), 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.101
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL ILMIAH PENELITIAN MAHASISWA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
